tv series

BBC show ‘Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond’ confuses 007 with his creator

The mini-series, which is being telecast on Zee Cafe is a mostly humdrum affair with a weak central performance by Dominic Cooper.

James Bond creator Ian Fleming operated from behind the scenes for the British Naval Intelligence during World War II. He was behind a number of British intelligence innovations, including Operation Goldeneye, a name he later used for his home in Jamaica from where he wrote the Bond books. Fleming was a good strategist, had a cavalier disregard for authority, and, when he wasn’t saving the Queen from behind his desk, was a womaniser.

However, Fleming always wanted to be in the middle of the action. The conclusion of the war ended his dreams of getting a shot at being a hero. So he made up a daredevil spy – agent 007 James Bond – who could do all the things that he couldn’t during his time as an intelligence officer. The four-part BBC miniseries Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond is the third and by far the most exhaustive fictional depiction of Ian Fleming during his years up to the creation of James Bond. The series was shown on BBC in 2014 and is being broadcast in India on Zee Cafe.

Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond.

Charles Dance and Jason Connery (son of Sean) have previously played Fleming in the television films Goldeneye: The Secret Life of Ian Fleming (1989) and Spymaker: The Secret Life of Ian Fleming (1990) respectively. Where Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond differs essentially, apart from being lengthier, is the detail with which Fleming’s love life is explored. This does not really improve the final product in any way. The miniseries is, for the most part, a humdrum affair.

Blame it on lead actor Dominic Cooper. The Fleming character here is portrayed exactly like James Bond. He is a smooth talker and a selfish lover. Women can’t resist him but are also wary of him. He doesn’t think twice before doing something silly that could endanger himself and those around him. If he hadn’t been named Ian Fleming, he could have been mistaken for James Bond.

Add to this ambivalence the wartime intrigue, lavish production design and a couple of tense spy-on-a-mission sequences and the show looks like a Bond movie me-too.

While the show mythologises Fleming and requires a super-human central performance, Cooper is as bland as an arrowroot biscuit. He does exude the broken masculinity of a writer, but a swashbuckler he is not. The only moments where he appears to be in full control are the sex scenes, in which he spanks his woman to get a rise. These sadomasochistic moments with actor Lara Pulver (Irene Adler in BBC’s Sherlock) playing Ann, Fleming’s future wife, are more campy than they are steamy.

It is Pulver, though, who lifts the show whenever she is on screen. She is the right amount of seductive and sincere. Much of the running time is devoted to building up the chemistry between Ann and Ian Fleming. They circle each other like alley cats, but once their relationship is consummated, the playfulness disappears, both from their romance and the series.

Dominic Cooper and Lara Pulver in Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond. Image credit: BBC.
Dominic Cooper and Lara Pulver in Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond. Image credit: BBC.

At the expense of attempting to mount a low-budget spy romance drama, the makers of Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond fail to invest genuine depth in its characters. We don’t get any insights into what makes Fleming so foolhardy, distant and contemptuous of women. His mother’s domineering nature and the presence of an over-achieving elder brother (Peter Fleming, one of the inspirations for Bond) do suggest some answers, but at the end of the day, the show does not really explore the protagonist’s inner mind. It is too pleased with being a wannabe Bond, unlike the real Ian Fleming, whose discontent eventually goaded him to write, as Cooper says in the show, “the spy novel to end all spy novels”.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Putting the patient first - insights for hospitals to meet customer service expectations

These emerging solutions are a fine balance between technology and the human touch.

As customers become more vocal and assertive of their needs, their expectations are changing across industries. Consequently, customer service has gone from being a hygiene factor to actively influencing the customer’s choice of product or service. This trend is also being seen in the healthcare segment. Today good healthcare service is no longer defined by just qualified doctors and the quality of medical treatment offered. The overall ambience, convenience, hospitality and the warmth and friendliness of staff is becoming a crucial way for hospitals to differentiate themselves.

A study by the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions in fact indicates that good patient experience is also excellent from a profitability point of view. The study, conducted in the US, analyzed the impact of hospital ratings by patients on overall margins and return on assets. It revealed that hospitals with high patient-reported experience scores have higher profitability. For instance, hospitals with ‘excellent’ consumer assessment scores between 2008 and 2014 had a net margin of 4.7 percent, on average, as compared to just 1.8 percent for hospitals with ‘low’ scores.

This clearly indicates that good customer service in hospitals boosts loyalty and goodwill as well as financial performance. Many healthcare service providers are thus putting their efforts behind: understanding constantly evolving customer expectations, solving long-standing problems in hospital management (such as long check-out times) and proactively offering a better experience by leveraging technology and human interface.

The evolving patient

Healthcare service customers, who comprise both the patient and his or her family and friends, are more exposed today to high standards of service across industries. As a result, hospitals are putting patient care right on top of their priorities. An example of this in action can be seen in the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. In July 2015, the hospital launched a ‘Smart OPD’ system — an integrated mobile health system under which the entire medical ecosystem of the hospital was brought together on a digital app. Patients could use the app to book/reschedule doctor’s appointments and doctors could use it to access a patient’s medical history, write prescriptions and schedule appointments. To further aid the process, IT assistants were provided to help those uncomfortable with technology.

The need for such initiatives and the evolving nature of patient care were among the central themes of the recently concluded Abbott Hospital Leadership Summit. The speakers included pundits from marketing and customer relations along with leaders in the healthcare space.

Among them was the illustrious speaker Larry Hochman, a globally recognised name in customer service. According to Mr. Hochman, who has worked with British Airways and Air Miles, patients are rapidly evolving from passive recipients of treatment to active consumers who are evaluating their overall experience with a hospital on social media and creating a ‘word-of-mouth’ economy. He talks about this in the video below.


As the video says, with social media and other public platforms being available today to share experiences, hospitals need to ensure that every customer walks away with a good experience.

The promise gap

In his address, Mr. Hochman also spoke at length about the ‘promise gap’ — the difference between what a company promises to deliver and what it actually delivers. In the video given below, he explains the concept in detail. As the gap grows wider, the potential for customer dissatisfaction increases.


So how do hospitals differentiate themselves with this evolved set of customers? How do they ensure that the promise gap remains small? “You can create a unique value only through relationships, because that is something that is not manufactured. It is about people, it’s a human thing,” says Mr. Hochman in the video below.


As Mr. Hochman and others in the discussion panel point out, the key to delivering a good customer experience is to instil a culture of empathy and hospitality across the organisation. Whether it is small things like smiling at patients, educating them at every step about their illness or listening to them to understand their fears, every action needs to be geared towards making the customer feel that they made the correct decision by getting treated at that hospital. This is also why, Dr. Nandkumar Jairam, Chairman and Group Medical Director, Columbia Asia, talked about the need for hospitals to train and hire people with soft skills and qualities such as empathy and the ability to listen.

Striking the balance

Bridging the promise gap also involves a balance between technology and the human touch. Dr. Robert Pearl, Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group, who also spoke at the event, wrote about the example of Dr. Devi Shetty’s Narayana Health Hospitals. He writes that their team of surgeons typically performs about 900 procedures a month which is equivalent to what most U.S. university hospitals do in a year. The hospitals employ cutting edge technology and other simple innovations to improve efficiency and patient care.

The insights gained from Narayana’s model show that while technology increases efficiency of processes, what really makes a difference to customers are the human touch-points. As Mr. Hochman says, “Human touch points matter more because there are less and less of them today and are therefore crucial to the whole customer experience.”


By putting customers at the core of their thinking, many hospitals have been able to apply innovative solutions to solve age old problems. For example, Max Healthcare, introduced paramedics on motorcycles to circumvent heavy traffic and respond faster to critical emergencies. While ambulances reach 30 minutes after a call, the motorcycles reach in just 17 minutes. In the first three months, two lives were saved because of this customer-centric innovation.

Hospitals are also looking at data and consumer research to identify consumer pain points. Rajit Mehta, the MD and CEO of Max Healthcare Institute, who was a panelist at the summit, spoke of the importance of data to understand patient needs. His organisation used consumer research to identify three critical areas that needed work - discharge and admission processes for IPD patients and wait-time for OPD patients. To improve wait-time, they incentivised people to book appointments online. They also installed digital kiosks where customers could punch in their details to get an appointment quickly.

These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.