Partition's ghosts

All these years later, nobody has chronicled the Partition like Ritwik Ghatak

The Bengali director’s films are one of the most powerful artistic articulations of the trauma of displacement after the Partition.

India’s moment of liberation from the British was also a moment of rupture: with independence came partition on August 15, 1947. Partition did not mean quite the same thing for Punjab and Bengal – the two provinces that got divided on the eastern and western borders of India – but there was one aspect that was common to both: most ordinary citizens found it difficult to accept the fact of partition and their lives changed beyond recognition once they became refugees.

And yet, as far as Bengal was concerned, Partition hardly had any immediate thematic impact on film or literature. The first Bengali novel to deal with partition came out only in 1955 – Narayan Sanyal’s Bakultala P.L.Camp. But it was highlighted on celluloid much earlier, in the 1950 classic, Chinnamul (The Uprooted), by Nemai Ghosh. This landmark film, which ushered in Bengali cinematic realism, relates the story of a group of farmers from East Bengal who are forced to migrate to Calcutta because of Partition. Ghosh used actual refugees as characters and extras in the film, but there were some seasoned theatre actors in the cast as well. One of them was Ritwik Ghatak – who would soon turn director himself and make the partition theme his own.

Ghatak’s films are one of the most powerful artistic articulations of the trauma of displacement after the Partition. The cultural unity of the two Bengals was an article of faith with him. He never accepted the Partition and it became an obsessive theme with him.

Ritwik Ghatak (1925-1976).
Ritwik Ghatak (1925-1976).

In a cinematic career that spanned over 25 years until his death in 1976 at the age of 50, Ghatak left behind him eight feature films, 10 documentaries and a handful of unfinished fragments. But he is remembered mostly for his feature films. Recognition came his way very late, as he had the misfortune of being largely ignored by the Bengali film public in his own lifetime. This was particularly unfortunate; as Ghatak was one of the most innovative of Indian filmmakers, developing an epic style that uniquely combined realism, myth and melodrama in his films.

Before he came to films, however, Ghatak had been involved with the Indian People’s Theatre Association, the cultural wing of the Communist Party of India, which, since 1943, led a highly creative movement of politically engaged art and literature, bringing into its fold the foremost artists of the time. IPTA had a profound influence on Ghatak. True to its credentials, he strongly believed in the social commitment of the artist; hence, even when he left theatre for cinema, he always made films for a social cause.

Cinema, to him, was a form of protest; and more than any other artist of his time, he used this medium to highlight the biggest contemporary issue in India – the Partition and its aftermath. As he once said: “Cinema, to me, is a means of expressing my anger at the sorrows and sufferings of my people. Being a Bengali from East Bengal, I have seen untold miseries inflicted on my people in the name of independence – which is fake and a sham. I have reacted violently to this – and I have tried to portray different aspects of this in my films.”

Ghatak was, however, averse to the term “refugee problem”. In one of his interviews, he said, “I have tackled the refugee problem, as you have used the term, not as a ‘refugee’ problem. To me it was the division of a culture and I was shocked”. This shock would give birth to a trilogy on the Partition – Meghe Dhaka Tara (The Cloud-capped Star), 1960; Komal Gandhar (E Flat), 1961; and Subarnarekha (The Golden Thread), 1962. In them, he highlighted the insecurity and anxiety engendered by the homelessness of the refugees of Bengal; tried to convey how Partition struck at the roots of Bengali culture; and sought to express the nostalgia and yearning that many Bengalis felt for their pre-Partition way of life.

‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’.
‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’.

Meghe Dhaka Tara, based on Shaktipada Rajguru’s Bengali novel of the same name, is one of Ghatak’s best-known films on this theme. It also has the distinction of being the only film by him that had been well received by the audience on its release. The narrative centers round Nita (Supriya Chowdhury), a refugee in a colony in Calcutta, who struggles to maintain her impoverished family – at first, giving private tuitions to school children; and then, as the financial situation worsens at home, by working full-time in an office, giving up on her own graduate studies. She is the exploited daughter, taken-for-granted sister, and betrayed lover – and ends up being just a source of income for the family. She is the victim not just of the Partition, but of familial pressures, and her life ends tragically fighting tuberculosis – though not before she cries out her desire to live to her brother (Anil Chatterjee) in a hill sanatorium and admitting that she had wronged in accepting injustice, that she should have protested for her rights.

‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’.

Komal Gandhar revolves round the progressive theatre movement in Bengal in the early 1950s, set against the memories of Partition. The protagonists, Bhrigu and Anasuya (Supriya Chaudhuri and Abanish Banerjee), belong to two rival theatre groups; but they come close because of their shared passion for the theatre and their shared longing for the homes they had to leave behind in East Bengal. This film was one of Ghatak’s own favourites because of the challenge of operating at different levels: in it, he drew simultaneously on the divided heart of Anasuya (who is torn between Bhrigu and Samar, the man she was betrothed to years ago, now living in France), the divided leadership of the theatre movement, and the pain of divided Bengal. But his audience was not prepared for such a complex film and rejected it out of hand.

‘Komal Gandhar’.
‘Komal Gandhar’.

Subarnarekha, once again, is about refugees from East Bengal and centres around a brother and sister pair (played by Abhi Bhattacharya and Madhabi Mukherjee). In search of a better living and a secured future for his sister, Seeta, Ishwar (who is more of a father than a brother to the little girl), leaves their refugee colony in Calcutta and takes up a job in an iron foundry in the remote, rocky district of Chhatimpur, in neighbouring Bihar. But his sister ironically faces the same grinding poverty that he wanted her to avoid when she elopes with and marries a penniless writer, Abhiram (Satindra Bhattacharya), her childhood playmate and a low-caste boy whom Ishwar had adopted while leaving Calcutta.


Brother and sister meet again in exceptional circumstances: she is the prostitute he comes to after a night of mad abandon with his friend in Calcutta; and he is her first client, when Abhiram’s sudden death in an accident leaves her with no other option but to turn to this trade. Ishwar is devastated by the encounter and Seeta kills herself, watched by her son. At the end of the film, an aged Ishwar leads Seeta’s child to the promised ‘new house’ in Chhatimpur by the river, which forms the leitmotif throughout the film.

Nita, Sita, and Anasuya, the three heroines of Ghatak’s Partition trilogy, are flesh and blood women of his times, but Ghatak gives their contemporary tales of suffering a timeless appeal by giving them a mythic dimension. In their own unique ways, they represent the travails of Durga, Sita and Sakuntala respectively – parallels that has been brilliantly analysed byAshish Rajadhyaksha in his book, Ritwik Ghatak: A Return to the Epic (1982).

No other Bengali filmmaker had the kind of deep engagement with the theme of Partition as Ghatak had. In fact, in all the four decades since his death, partition seems to have been significantly absent from the very imagination of directors. However, in the last few years there has been a slight change: 2013 saw the release of Meghe Dhaka Tara, a theatrical biopic of Ghatak directed by Kamleswar Mukherjee, with Saswata Chatterjee in the lead role. In 2015, after decades, a Partition film was released: Srijit Mukherji’s Rajkahini, with Rituparna Sengupta playing the lead. It’s about how a brothel keeper, Begum Jaan, and her 11 inmates defy the Radcliffe Line that passes through their brothel, refusing to budge from their ‘home’. Let’s hope that this film will start a new trend of Partition films.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

What’s the difference between ‘a’ washing machine and a ‘great’ washing machine?

The right machine can save water, power consumption, time, energy and your clothes from damage.

In 2010, Hans Rosling, a Swedish statistician, convinced a room full of people that the washing machine was the greatest invention of the industrial revolution. In the TED talk delivered by him, he illuminates how the washing machine freed women from doing hours of labour intensive laundry, giving them the time to read books and eventually join the labour force. Rosling’s argument rings true even today as it is difficult to deny the significance of the washing machine in our everyday lives.

For many households, buying a washing machine is a sizable investment. Oddly, buyers underestimate the importance of the decision-making process while buying one and don’t research the purchase as much as they would for a television or refrigerator. Most buyers limit their buying criteria to type, size and price of the washing machine.

Visible technological advancements can be seen all around us, making it fair to expect a lot more from household appliances, especially washing machines. Here are a few features to expect and look out for before investing in a washing machine:

Cover your basics

Do you wash your towels every day? How frequently do you do your laundry? Are you okay with a bit of manual intervention during the wash cycle? These questions will help filter the basic type of washing machine you need. The semi-automatics require manual intervention to move clothes from the washing tub to the drying tub and are priced lower than a fully-automatic. A fully-automatic comes in two types: front load and top load. Front loading machines use less water by rotating the inner drum and using gravity to move the clothes through water.

Size matters

The size or the capacity of the machine is directly proportional to the consumption of electricity. The right machine capacity depends on the daily requirement of the household. For instance, for couples or individuals, a 6kg capacity would be adequate whereas a family of four might need an 8 kg or bigger capacity for their laundry needs. This is an important factor to consider since the wrong decision can consume an unnecessary amount of electricity.

Machine intelligence that helps save time

In situations when time works against you and your laundry, features of a well-designed washing machine can come to rescue. There are programmes for urgent laundry needs that provide clean laundry in a super quick 15 to 30 minutes’ cycle; a time delay feature that can assist you to start the laundry at a desired time etc. Many of these features dispel the notion that longer wash cycles mean cleaner clothes. In fact, some washing machines come with pre-activated wash cycles that offer shortest wash cycles across all programmes without compromising on cleanliness.

The green quotient

Despite the conveniences washing machines offer, many of them also consume a substantial amount of electricity and water. By paying close attention to performance features, it’s possible to find washing machines that use less water and energy. For example, there are machines which can adjust the levels of water used based on the size of the load. The reduced water usage, in turn, helps reduce the usage of electricity. Further, machines that promise a silent, no-vibration wash don’t just reduce noise – they are also more efficient as they are designed to work with less friction, thus reducing the energy consumed.

Customisable washing modes

Crushed dresses, out-of-shape shirts and shrunken sweaters are stuff of laundry nightmares. Most of us would rather take out the time to hand wash our expensive items of clothing rather than trusting the washing machine. To get the dirt out of clothes, washing machines use speed to first agitate the clothes and spin the water out of them, a process that takes a toll on the fabric. Fortunately, advanced machines come equipped with washing modes that control speed and water temperature depending on the fabric. While jeans and towels can endure a high-speed tumble and spin action, delicate fabrics like silk need a gentler wash at low speeds. Some machines also have a monsoon mode. This is an India specific mode that gives clothes a hot rinse and spin to reduce drying time during monsoons. A super clean mode will use hot water to clean the clothes deeply.

Washing machines have come a long way, from a wooden drum powered by motor to high-tech machines that come equipped with automatic washing modes. Bosch washing machines include all the above-mentioned features and provide damage free laundry in an energy efficient way. With 32 different washing modes, Bosch washing machines can create custom wash cycles for different types of laundry, be it lightly soiled linens, or stained woollens. The ActiveWater feature in Bosch washing machines senses the laundry load and optimises the usage of water and electricity. Its EcoSilentDrive motor draws energy from a permanent magnet, thereby saving energy and giving a silent wash. The fear of expensive clothes being wringed to shapelessness in a washing machine is a common one. The video below explains how Bosch’s unique VarioDrumTM technology achieves damage free laundry.


To start your search for the perfect washing machine, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Bosch and not by the Scroll editorial team.