Queer cinema

‘Kapoor & Sons’, ‘Aligarh’ and the debt they owe to ‘Fire’

Twenty years after Deepa Mehta’s seminal movie, Bollywood is finally, but gingerly, making gay men protagonists.

With Aligarh and Kapoor & Sons being nearly universally lauded, it would seem that the era of the gay man in Bollywood has finally arrived. After being caricatured, pushed into the shadows, or plain ignored, the gay man (and so far it has largely been only the man) is now finally making an appearance as the protagonist.

It’s taken a good 20 years for us to reach here. Fire was released in 1996, and that film, so ahead of its times, heralded a new grammar for the gay Indian film. In some ways, Fire achieved what Bollywood has been unable to in the years since. By setting its love story smack in the middle of heterosexual family dynamics and by first questioning and then wholly incinerating those dynamics, Fire was more than a gay film. Its aesthetic was deeply and politically queer.

In the interim, the conversation around gay issues has entered our living rooms. With the Supreme Court admitting the curative petition on its December 2013 judgement that recriminalised homosexuality, hopes for an egalitarian outcome are high. That judgement came on the back of the Delhi High Court judgement of 2009 that struck down Section 377. Taken together, these judgements elicited a much-needed debate on the urgency of ushering equal rights.

Coterminous with this has been a rising trend to shift gay storylines from the indie circuit (the films of Onir, for instance) to the heart of mainstream Bollywood. This year, for example, two films that substantially address homosexuality have been released. Aligarh, about the gay Aligarh Muslim University professor Ramchandra Siras, recounts the trial and the subsequent death by (alleged) suicide of a man who was hounded for his sexuality.

The trailer of ‘Aligarh’.

The other film, Kapoor & Sons, showcases an upper middle class man who returns home from the United Kingdom for a private family affair and uses the opportunity to come out to his family.

The trailer of ‘Kapoor & Sons’.

Both films, in spite of being set in very different contexts, work studiously to further the cause of gay rights. In Aligarh, we see a small-town man who is uncomfortable with the attention his case (invasion of privacy emerging out of video-recording a homosexual act) has garnered. In Kapoor & Sons, the battles are more private but no less angst-ridden for that. In both movies, the sheer force of prejudice and how it is internalised, within families and societies is brought out remarkably.

Both films subconsciously tip their hat to Fire, the first, and the most bruising, example of how resolutely homosexual love can threaten heterosexual mores. Fire was completely different in that not only was it about lesbianism (a subject matter rarely broached sensitively even in the new Bollywood), it was also a stark attack on patriarchy and the hypocrisies of the Indian middle class. Its power lay in questioning the very basis of the Indian family, something that none of the latest films emerging from Bollywood do.

The trailer of ‘Fire’.

The films also chart the changing nature of coming out. In Fire, Radha (Shabana Azmi) and Sita (Nandita Das) find love in a domestic setting, a love that is occasioned by their coming together via their respective heterosexual marriages to two brothers. Radha’s husband is living the life of an ascetic and has given up on sex. Sita’s has a girlfriend and does not make time for her (Sita).

Radha and Sita are forced to come out when they are discovered together by their family. The film leaves the delicate point of whether they are homosexual hanging. While it is Sita who makes the first move (she lands a kiss on Radha’s lips), it is moot whether the women would have found love if they had been in happy marriages.

In Aligarh, as in Fire, the coming out is not natural but forced by external circumstances. The events of the film are set in motion by the recording of a sex act between Siras (Manoj Bajpayee) and another man. When forced into the limelight like this, Siras seems chary of being labelled “gay”, and harbours what Jai Arjun Singh called in Mint a “provincial conservatism”.

The word “gay” is missing from Kapoor & Sons too, but it would be incorrect to put this down to a deliberate censoring. The world of Kapoor & Sons seems at first to be the most amenable to coming out. These are upper middle class people who live abroad and make careers in such professions of the mind as writing. And yet, such is homosexuality – so different, so intrinsic, so unidentifiable, unlike other markers of difference – that when the time comes to reveal his secret, Rahul is as angst-ridden as the “provincial” professor of Aligarh.

Rahul (Fawad Khan) has made a successful life in the United Kingdom, where he has a boyfriend. We don’t know if he is in a civil partnership, which the UK allows for same-sex couples, or if the couple leads a more “queer” life. Those details are elided because the film derives its thrust from Rahul’s aching need to come out to his family in India.

As an aside, Kapoor & Sons marks a significant shift for Dharma Productions, whose films, while being the only ones from a major production house to regularly include homosexual characters, have shied away from meaningful representations. From Dostana to Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhaniya, the gay men in Dharma films have done little more than serve the cause of visibility, and it is debatable whether the visibility they have bestowed has helped matters. Kapoor & Sons is perhaps the first film from the stable that takes the conversation forward.

The song ‘Ma Da Laadla’ from ‘Dostana’.

It is worth pondering if the narrative focus on coming out is a result of the dominant social attitudes towards homosexuality, which find ready support in the law. If being gay itself is such an issue, it is little wonder that our filmmakers focus on the contours of revealing that information to the world.

For this reason, both Aligarh and Kapoor & Sons, for all their blessed egalitarianism, are also conservative in that they tackle homosexuality as something that needs to be, well, tackled. The cinematic treatment revolves around the difference that alternative sexuality bestows and the very real consequences of that difference. Homosexuality is not what it is, but what it can lead to, how it can disturb the stable currents of heterosexual society.

How long before gayness is introduced just “by the way” in Hindi films? It can be argued that the current gay cinema is preparing the ground for that eventuality by shifting away from visibility to representation. As more LGBT stories get shown, the expectation is that these stories will give way to thoroughly gay cinema. Social change should help, which in turn will be hastened by legal sanction. Movements in cinema, as in society, progress in fits and starts. On current evidence, we should have hope.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Advice from an ex-robber on how to keep your home safe

Tips on a more hands-on approach of keeping your house secure.

Home, a space that is entirely ours, holds together our entire world. Where our children grow-up, parents grow old and we collect a lifetime of memories, home is a feeling as much as it’s a place. So, what do you do when your home is eyed by miscreants who prowl the neighbourhood night and day, plotting to break in? Here are a few pre-emptive measures you can take to make your home safe from burglars:

1. Get inside the mind of a burglar

Before I break the lock of a home, first I bolt the doors of the neighbouring homes. So that, even if someone hears some noise, they can’t come to help.

— Som Pashar, committed nearly 100 robberies.

Burglars study the neighbourhood to keep a check on the ins and outs of residents and target homes that can be easily accessed. Understanding how the mind of a burglar works might give insights that can be used to ward off such danger. For instance, burglars judge a house by its front doors. A house with a sturdy door, secured by an alarm system or an intimidating lock, doesn’t end up on the burglar’s target list. Upgrade the locks on your doors to the latest technology to leave a strong impression.

Here are the videos of 3 reformed robbers talking about their modus operandi and what discouraged them from robbing a house, to give you some ideas on reinforcing your home.


2. Survey your house from inside out to scout out weaknesses

Whether it’s a dodgy back door, a misaligned window in your parent’s room or the easily accessible balcony of your kid’s room, identify signs of weakness in your home and fix them. Any sign of neglect can give burglars the idea that the house can be easily robbed because of lax internal security.

3. Think like Kevin McCallister from Home Alone

You don’t need to plant intricate booby traps like the ones in the Home Alone movies, but try to stay one step ahead of thieves. Keep your car keys on your bed-stand in the night so that you can activate the car alarm in case of unwanted visitors. When out on a vacation, convince the burglars that the house is not empty by using smart light bulbs that can be remotely controlled and switched on at night. Make sure that your newspapers don’t pile up in front of the main-door (a clear indication that the house is empty).

4. Protect your home from the outside

Collaborate with your neighbours to increase the lighting around your house and on the street – a well-lit neighbourhood makes it difficult for burglars to get-away, deterring them from targeting the area. Make sure that the police verification of your hired help is done and that he/she is trustworthy.

While many of us take home security for granted, it’s important to be proactive to eliminate even the slight chance of a robbery. As the above videos show, robbers come up with ingenious ways to break in to homes. So, take their advice and invest in a good set of locks to protect your doors. Godrej Locks offer a range of innovative locks that are un-pickable and un-duplicable. To secure your house, see here.

The article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Godrej Locks and not by the Scroll editorial team.