What should the new Bollywood film be called? ‘Underdog’, ‘balcony’, or ‘new-age mainstream’?

Recent releases such as ‘Piku’, Neerja’ and ‘Kapoor & Sons’ cannot be described as typical Bollywood anymore.

There is a newish Hindi film in our midst, and it badly needs a name.

This film doesn’t have the characteristic “masala” flavour that is typical of the average Hindi film production. Its plots and themes move beyond romance to family dynamics, coming-of-age stories and accounts of achievement and struggle. It has a feel-good ending but also realism in the performances and the settings. The songs, if any, are relegated to the background. This film are not an arthouse exploration that is concerned with the language of cinema itself, but a drama of the kinds that get nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars. And many of these films are performing very well at the box office.

The examples include Queen, NH10, Piku, Margarita With A Straw, Dum Lage Ke Haisha, Masaan, Talvar, Highway, Aligarh, Kapoor & Sons, Neerja and Nil Battey Sannata. There are enough titles to assign them their own category, a descriptor that is as easily resonant as Bollywood is in the West.

What should it be? Midstream cinema (which is our chosen phrase)? Offbeat commercial? Mainstream minnows? Thinking entertainers?

The trailer of ‘Piku’.

People in the Hindi movie trade usually refer to such projects “small” or “content-driven” films. These interchangeable terms are typically used for movies that lack A-list stars, conventional plots and high budgets. The slipperiness of this categorisation is evident from the fact that several midstream films have been funded and distributed by top-ranking studios. Kapoor & Sons, for instance, has been co-produced by Dharma Productions and Fox Star Studios and stars Fawad Khan, Sidharth Malhotra and Alia Bhatt. Its estimated budget was Rs 45 crores and it made over Rs 70 crores at the box office. Neerja, also from Fox Star Studios, stars Sonam Kapoor, was made on Rs 21 crores, and earned over Rs 65 crores. Queen, co-produced by Phantom Films and Viacom18 Motion Pictures, cost Rs 21 crores and raked in over Rs 60 crores.

The recently released Nil Battey Sannata is by first-time director Ashwini Iyer Tiwari and stars the relatively unknown Swara Bhaskar, but it was acquired and distributed by the leading studio Eros Entertainment. “Pure commercial cinema that reflects life” was the phrase used by an Eros employee, on the condition of anonymity.
The trailer of ‘Nil Battey Sannata’.

Another trade term is based on the audiences that are targetted by such films. “We call these gentry films – the clientele is the same as for Hollywood,” said a distribution head at a leading studio who is not authorised to talk to the media. “The maximum business for these films is in the cities. They are being consumed by the urban and aspirational middle class, and they are typically programmed heavily at the PVR and Inox multiplexes.”

This sizeable chunk of moviegoers comprises the children and grandchildren of the patrons of the middle cinema of Hrishikesh Mukherjee, Basu Bhattacharya and Shyam Benegal in the 1980s. The narratives of middle cinema were set mostly in the cities and in the same economic bracket from which its viewers hailed. This was the class of filmgoers that would watch new releases in the balcony section of single screen cinemas, and accordingly, director Rohan Sippy’s term for the new filmmaking strain is “balcony cinema”.

“Earlier, you had commercial versus art, and there is no such binary to explain the mainstream now,” Sippy said. “One useful way to look at films like Neerja and Kapoor & Sons is to consider the fact that such films play well among the multiplex audiences that have replaced the single screen balcony viewers. It’s a logical progression.”

The midstream film is also a logical progression from what used to be called the Hindi indie, or at its simplest, the Anurag Kashyap movie. Films that Kashyap directed and produced, such as Dev.D, Gangs of Wasseypur, Udaan and Shaitaan were routinely described as “edgy”. Their themes covered urban crime, angst-bitten youth, and rebellion without a cause. Kashyap’s Raman Raghav 2.0, which will be released on June 24, is one example of this tradition.

The trailer of ‘Raman Raghav 2.0’.

The edgy enterprise gained legitimacy when the production company UTV Films (which has since been taken over by the Hollywood studio Disney) ran a division called UTV Spotboy. Set up in 2009, and inaugurating its short-lived slate with Kashyap’s Dev.D, UTV Spotboy produced such well-regarded films as Welcome to Sajjanpur, No One Killed Jessica and Paan Singh Tomar before folding up.

Since then, several films that carry the distinctive stamp of their directors have emerged. The midstream category can get as baggy as “Bollywood” itself, and filmmakers such as Zoya Akhtar, Sriram Raghavan and Vishal Bhardwaj, who cast stars in unconventional narratives, don’t easily fit into the existing slots.

What might be more useful is to look at the spirit of these projects. “I call this is the underdog film – the kind from which you don’t expect anything,” said Rucha Pathak, chief creative officer at Fox Star Studios. “Earlier too we were making these kinds of films, but what is happening now is that some of the bigger projects are failing, while these so-called smaller films have been doing better than before.”

The midstream category can have sections depending on the budgets, said Ajit Andhare, Chief Operating Officer of Viacom18 Motion Pictures – leading to further nomenclature. “I call films like Margarita with a Straw and Angry Indian Goddesses studio indies since they are entirely content-driven and are not pegged to any popular faces,” Andhare said. “Then there is another segment in which I would put a film like Manjhi the Mountain Man – a small-mid film, which has a reasonable budget upwards of Rs 10 crores, and has some commercial prospects.” Manjhi, directed by Ketan Mehta and distributed by Viacom18, had Nawazuddin Siddiqui in the lead role.

It is the small-mid films that have been shaking up box office, Andhare said, pointing to works like Mary Kom (starring Priyanka Chopra), Piku (Deepika Padukone), Queen (Kangana Ranaut) and Neerja (Sonam Kapoor). “These films have marketable parts – they can be broadly classified as pure content that has stars attached, which makes them move towards the mainstream.” Midstream cinema has also immensely boosted the prospects of actresses and helped them headline projects that might otherwise have been driven by actors some years ago.

What is this thing called Bollywood?

Midstream films are landing in cinemas in the middle of one of the most significant churnings in Bollywood since the early 1990s. The definition of a mainstream Hindi movie has been changed, perhaps irrevocably, in the last few years. Audiences are still flocking to watch Salman Khan bare his chest and Rohit Shetty blow up cars, but there is also a demand for storytelling styles that eschew typical Bollywood showboating. One recent example is Raja Menon’s Airlift (2016), a hugely successful political thriller that is based on the real-life operation to evacuate one lakh Indians in 1990 from war-torn Kuwait. Airlift stars A-list actor Akshay Kumar, but it tamps down the melodrama that is a staple feature of such ventures and tells its story as realistically as possible. 

The trailer of ‘Airlift’.

This newfound expansiveness among audiences has been building up for several years. Tastes among urban viewers have evolved with sustained exposure to Hollywood, world cinema and American and British television. Indian television has taken over the role of supplying overwrought melodrama. Multiplexes dominate exhibition patterns in metropolises and second-rung cities, and their smaller auditoriums make it possible to programme films that might have died in single-screen cinemas with their enormous capacities.

“New storytelling subjects are becoming available to filmmakers since they don’t have to depend on star pull but can make do with word of mouth publicity,” Andhare said. This is not to suggest that a wholly mainstream film like Baaghi or an old-fashioned tearjerker like Bajrangi Bhaijaan won’t work anymore. They will, but so will the minnows who are swimming alongside the big fish.

The creation of a new term will certainly help in expanding box office reach, said Ranjan Singh, producer at Phantom Films, whose upcoming titles are Raman Raghav 2.0 and Udta Punjab. “I heard the term ‘new-age mainstream’ the other day,” Singh said. “Such films have not been working because there has been no nomenclature. They are not commercial, they are not art, and you can’t go by the old hit and flop terminology.”

Midstream films might appear to be offbeat, but their publicity campaigns run on the same lines as regular A-listers. Trailer launches, covers and spreads in magazines and newspapers, city tours, tie-ins with popular television shows, and wall-to-wall coverage on television and digital platforms are all part of the strategy to make such potentially risky material acceptable.

The regularity with which such movies are being churned out makes it imperative to ensure that potential audiences are not alienated by their eventual message. “Indie films are like garage sales – you put up something to sell without realising what the demand is,” Ranjan Singh said. “If I make a product and then talk about it in a language that is not familiar, how will people come?” Raman Ragahv 2.0 will be sold on the indie cred of director Anurag Kashyap, but there are other tricks up the producer’s sleeve – emoticons for the main characters of the serial killer and the police officer who hunts him, for instance. “The trailer and the poster should be close to the film, but the promotions need not necessarily be linked to the film, but should push the idea of entertainment,” Singh said.

Is the effort to create a new terminology worth the trouble, given that Bollywood is no stranger to flashes in the pan and trend cycles? “This kind of film is here to stay,” asserted Rucha Pathak. “This has been building up for some time, but now, the audience has spoken. Earlier, we were the ones pushing such films, but now, it’s the distributors and exhibitors who are asking for them. The line between mainstream and different content has really blurred.”

Even Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania, a 2014 romance featuring the saleable stars Varun Dhawan and Alia Bhatt and a chartbusting score, had lashings of realism, Pathak pointed out. Perhaps the biggest shift in the mainstream can be seen in the films of Sanjay Leela Bhansali. He has toned down his operatic style in his last two releases, Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ramleela (2014) and Bajirao Mastani (2015). While Bhansali remains obsessed with big-budget spectacles, gorgeous stars, and soaring musical scores, the stuff in between these typical Bollywood elements is rendered on a more human scale than before.

Bhansali is still making the typical Bollywood film, though, and he is easy enough to classify. It’s the other guys who are recasting the rules that govern the life cycle of a typical Hindi movie. Their creations can no longer be designated as “content-driven” or “small”. When the indie starts to get popular, it’s time to reach for the dictionary.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Putting the patient first - insights for hospitals to meet customer service expectations

These emerging solutions are a fine balance between technology and the human touch.

As customers become more vocal and assertive of their needs, their expectations are changing across industries. Consequently, customer service has gone from being a hygiene factor to actively influencing the customer’s choice of product or service. This trend is also being seen in the healthcare segment. Today good healthcare service is no longer defined by just qualified doctors and the quality of medical treatment offered. The overall ambience, convenience, hospitality and the warmth and friendliness of staff is becoming a crucial way for hospitals to differentiate themselves.

A study by the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions in fact indicates that good patient experience is also excellent from a profitability point of view. The study, conducted in the US, analyzed the impact of hospital ratings by patients on overall margins and return on assets. It revealed that hospitals with high patient-reported experience scores have higher profitability. For instance, hospitals with ‘excellent’ consumer assessment scores between 2008 and 2014 had a net margin of 4.7 percent, on average, as compared to just 1.8 percent for hospitals with ‘low’ scores.

This clearly indicates that good customer service in hospitals boosts loyalty and goodwill as well as financial performance. Many healthcare service providers are thus putting their efforts behind: understanding constantly evolving customer expectations, solving long-standing problems in hospital management (such as long check-out times) and proactively offering a better experience by leveraging technology and human interface.

The evolving patient

Healthcare service customers, who comprise both the patient and his or her family and friends, are more exposed today to high standards of service across industries. As a result, hospitals are putting patient care right on top of their priorities. An example of this in action can be seen in the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. In July 2015, the hospital launched a ‘Smart OPD’ system — an integrated mobile health system under which the entire medical ecosystem of the hospital was brought together on a digital app. Patients could use the app to book/reschedule doctor’s appointments and doctors could use it to access a patient’s medical history, write prescriptions and schedule appointments. To further aid the process, IT assistants were provided to help those uncomfortable with technology.

The need for such initiatives and the evolving nature of patient care were among the central themes of the recently concluded Abbott Hospital Leadership Summit. The speakers included pundits from marketing and customer relations along with leaders in the healthcare space.

Among them was the illustrious speaker Larry Hochman, a globally recognised name in customer service. According to Mr. Hochman, who has worked with British Airways and Air Miles, patients are rapidly evolving from passive recipients of treatment to active consumers who are evaluating their overall experience with a hospital on social media and creating a ‘word-of-mouth’ economy. He talks about this in the video below.


As the video says, with social media and other public platforms being available today to share experiences, hospitals need to ensure that every customer walks away with a good experience.

The promise gap

In his address, Mr. Hochman also spoke at length about the ‘promise gap’ — the difference between what a company promises to deliver and what it actually delivers. In the video given below, he explains the concept in detail. As the gap grows wider, the potential for customer dissatisfaction increases.


So how do hospitals differentiate themselves with this evolved set of customers? How do they ensure that the promise gap remains small? “You can create a unique value only through relationships, because that is something that is not manufactured. It is about people, it’s a human thing,” says Mr. Hochman in the video below.


As Mr. Hochman and others in the discussion panel point out, the key to delivering a good customer experience is to instil a culture of empathy and hospitality across the organisation. Whether it is small things like smiling at patients, educating them at every step about their illness or listening to them to understand their fears, every action needs to be geared towards making the customer feel that they made the correct decision by getting treated at that hospital. This is also why, Dr. Nandkumar Jairam, Chairman and Group Medical Director, Columbia Asia, talked about the need for hospitals to train and hire people with soft skills and qualities such as empathy and the ability to listen.

Striking the balance

Bridging the promise gap also involves a balance between technology and the human touch. Dr. Robert Pearl, Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group, who also spoke at the event, wrote about the example of Dr. Devi Shetty’s Narayana Health Hospitals. He writes that their team of surgeons typically performs about 900 procedures a month which is equivalent to what most U.S. university hospitals do in a year. The hospitals employ cutting edge technology and other simple innovations to improve efficiency and patient care.

The insights gained from Narayana’s model show that while technology increases efficiency of processes, what really makes a difference to customers are the human touch-points. As Mr. Hochman says, “Human touch points matter more because there are less and less of them today and are therefore crucial to the whole customer experience.”


By putting customers at the core of their thinking, many hospitals have been able to apply innovative solutions to solve age old problems. For example, Max Healthcare, introduced paramedics on motorcycles to circumvent heavy traffic and respond faster to critical emergencies. While ambulances reach 30 minutes after a call, the motorcycles reach in just 17 minutes. In the first three months, two lives were saved because of this customer-centric innovation.

Hospitals are also looking at data and consumer research to identify consumer pain points. Rajit Mehta, the MD and CEO of Max Healthcare Institute, who was a panelist at the summit, spoke of the importance of data to understand patient needs. His organisation used consumer research to identify three critical areas that needed work - discharge and admission processes for IPD patients and wait-time for OPD patients. To improve wait-time, they incentivised people to book appointments online. They also installed digital kiosks where customers could punch in their details to get an appointment quickly.

These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.